Home Page | Online Magazine | Forum | Book reviews | Hot links | Directory | Degree courses | Conferences | Services | Study Days | Search | Email us | Response form
![]() |
It didn't happen here: why socialism failed in the United States by Seymour Martin Lipset and Gary Marks. WW Norton & Co Ltd, 2000. ISBN hardback 0393040984 pp 379. Recommended price: Hardback: £19.95 Reviewed by Steve Perrin, Liverpool Hope University College |
|
It Didn't Happen Here sets out to examine why the United Stated is the only advanced industrial nation in the democratic world to have never developed a significant Socialist or Communist party. This is hardly a new topic, the authors themselves cite Werner Sombart's Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? (1906) as the first major work on the subject, and also point out that the question has exercised the minds of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, Wells, Weber and Gramsci, among others. Nor is it a subject of the lack of an organised political left in the States one which belongs solely to the past. At the time of writing trade union membership in North America is lower than that in most developed nations and public spending is exceptionally low. The authors offer up a number of plausible explanations for this phenomenon: weak leadership, the American party system and winner-take-all presidential elections, state repression, ethnic, racial and religious diversity among the working class making it difficult for socialists to find a power base, particularly among Catholics and blacks, the relative ease of social mobility in US society and the incompatibility of socialism with America's "core values". Uneasy as I am with the latter concept, the authors' choice of a comparative historical approach allows them to make a good case for American exceptionalism. Comparisons with Canada, which has a long and healthy history of democratic socialism, are particularly telling. It is argued that the constitutional blocks to any possibility of a strong central state have led to a nation with a collective belief in individualism and libertarianism in which radicals are more likely to be liberal and philanthropic than socialist and class-conscious. There is a plethora of material on this area already available, and the authors cover so much ground in so little space that significant figures such as King and McCarthy are reduced to bit players and the reader will search in vain for any mention of fringe groups such as the Yippies. It cannot be denied, however, that Lipset and Marks have achieved their brief of providing a readable and well-informed overview of a complex question, and their book can be recommended as such. Posted 13 February 2003
|
| American
Studies Today Online
is published by American Studies Resources Centre, Aldham Robarts Centre, Liverpool John Moores University, Mount Pleasant, Liverpool L3 5UZ, United Kingdom Tel and fax 0151-231 3241 International(+44)151-231 3241 E-mail online@americansc.org.uk |
The views expressed are those
of the contributors, and not necessarily those of the Centre, the College
or the University. © Liverpool Community College, Liverpool John Moores University and the Contributors, 2002. Articles and reviews in this journal may be freely reproduced for use in subscribing institutions only, provided that the source is acknowledged. |
Home Page | Online Magazine | Forum | Book reviews | Hot links | Directory | Degree courses | Conferences | Services | Study Days | Search | Email us | Response form